UPCScreenshot 3

Ultra Physical Contact (UPC) connector. This results in a lower back reflection (ORL) than a standard PC connector, allowing more reliable signals in digital TV, telephony and data systems, where UPC today dominates the market.

Most engineers and installers believe that any poor performance attributed to UPC connectors is not caused by the design, but rather poor cleaving and polishing techniques. UPC connectors do have a low insertion loss, but the back reflection (ORL) will depend on the quality of the fiber surface and, following repeat matings/unmatings, it will begin to deteriorate.


Angled Physical Contact Connector

So what the industry needed was a connector with low back reflection, that could sustain repeated matings/unmatings without ORL degradation. Step forward the Angled Physical Contact (APC) connector.

Although PC and UPC connectors have a wide range of applications, some instances require return losses in the region of one-in-a-million (60dB). Only APC connectors can consistently achieve such performance. This is because adding a small 8° angle to the end-face allows for even tighter connections and smaller end-face radii. Combined with that, any light that is redirected back towards the source is actually reflected out into the fiber cladding, again by virtue of the 8° angled end-face.

It is true that this slight angle on each connector brings with it rotation issues that Flat, PC and UPC connectors simply don’t have. It is also the case that the three aforementioned connectors are all inter-mateable, whereas the APC isn’t. So, why then is the APC connector so important in fiber optics?

The uses of APC connectors

The best feedback examples from my previous blog came from people experienced with FTTx and Radio Frequency (RF) applications. The advance in analogue fiber optic technology has driven demand for it to replace more traditional coaxial cable (copper). Unlike digital signals (which are either ON or OFF), the analogue equipment used in applications such as DAS, FTTH and CCTV is highly sensitive to changes in signal, and therefore requires minimal back reflection (ORL).

APC ferrules offer return losses of -65dB. In comparison a UPC ferrule is typically not more than -55dB. This may not sound like a major difference, but you have to remember that the decibel scale is not linear. To put that into context a -20dB loss equates to 1% of the light being reflected back, -50dB leads to nominal reflectance of 0.001%, and -60dB (typical of an APC ferrule) equates to just 0.0001% being reflected back. This means that whilst a UPC polished connector will be okay for a variety of optical fiber applications, only an APC will cope with the demands of complex and multi-play services.

The choice is even more important where connector ports in the distribution network might be left unused, as is often the case in FTTx PON network architectures. Here, optical splitters are used to connect multiple subscriber Optical Network Units (ONUs) or Optical Network Terminals (ONTs). This is not a problem with unmated APC connections where the signal is reflected into the fiber cladding, resulting in typical reflectance loss of -65dB or less. The signal from an unmated UPC connector however, will be sent straight back towards the light source, resulting in disastrously high loss (more than 14dB), massively impeding the splitter module performance.


Picking the right physical contact connector

Looking at current technology, it’s clear that all of the connector end-face options mentioned in this blog post have a place in the market. Indeed, if we take a sidestep across to Plastic Optical Fiber (POF) applications, this can be terminated with a sharp craft knife and performance is still deemed good enough for use in the high-end automotive industry. When your specification also needs to consider cost and simplicity, not just optical performance, it’s hard to claim that one connector beats the others. Therefore whether you choose UPC or APC will depend on your particular need. With those applications that call for high precision optical fiber signaling, APC should be the first consideration, but less sensitive digital systems will perform equally well using UPC.

There is no doubt that the optical performance of APC connectors is better than UPC connectors. In the current market, the APC connectors are widely used in applications such as FTTx, passive optical network (PON) and wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) that are more sensitive to return loss. But besides optical performance, the cost and simplicity also should be taken into consideration. So it’s hard to say that one connector beats the other. In fact, whether you choose UPC or APC will depend on your particular need. With those applications that call for high precision optical fiber signaling, APC should be the first consideration, but less sensitive digital systems will perform equally well using UPC.


LSZH—Short for low smoke zero halogen, LSZH is a kind of cable built with a jacket material free from halogenic materials (such as chlorine and fluorine), since the toxic nature of these chemicals when burned. The term “low-smoke, zero-halogen” describes two distinct properties of a cable compound. The term “low- smoke” describes the amount of smoke which a compound emits when burned, while “zero-halogen” describes the amount of halogens used to make the compound. Terms like LSOH, LSHF and LSNH are all proper references for cables possessing low-smoke and zero-halogen properties.

PVC—Polyvinyl chloride (vinyl), a general-purpose plastic jacket material used for cables. Features low in cost and flexible, PVC cable is widely used in applications such as computers, communications and low voltage wiring. In the world of cabling, “PVC” is often used to denote a cable that is not suitable for use in a plenum airspace. PVC can potentially be dangerous in a fire situation, releasing heavy smoke and hydrogen chloride gas, which poses a great threat to human health electronic devices. PVC cables often have a CM, CMG, or CMR rating as defined by the National Electrical Code (NEC).

Differences Between LSZH and PVC Cable

Judging from the physical appearance, the difference between LSZH and PVC cable is very distinct. A PVC cable feels soft and it is smooth, whereas an LSZH cable feels rough since they contain the flame retardant compound and it is stiffer. LSZH cables are more aesthetically appealing than PVC cables. In addition to this, LSZH cable differs from PVC one in at least three aspects:

Cost: LSZH cables are slightly higher in cost than some PVC cables, but they are much safer when it comes to human health and sensitive and expensive electronic equipment. And this should be considered when comparing the cost.

Flexibility: Comparing with PVC compounds, there is a limited range of compound flexibility available for LSZH compounds, so LSZH cable is not recommended for robotic or continuous flex applications.

Heat: When a PVC cable is set on fire, it emits chemical fumes, acids and other toxic gases, which are both corrosive and harmful to human beings and environments. As for LSZH cable that has a flame-resistant jacket, it doesn’t emit these chemical substances even if it burns or exposed to high sources of heat. And it can reduce the amount and density of the smoke.

When Do I Use LSZH or PVC?

It is feasible that LSZH and PVC have equally effective performance in modern buildings. So the decision on which one to choose actually depends on the situation, that is to say, where you are going to run the cable.

PVC cable has been used in built environment for power and control applications for decades. It is commonly used for horizontal runs from the wiring center, or for vertical runs between the floors—but only if the building features a contained ventilation system running through the duct work.

LSZH cable would be more appropriate for places where fire presents a hazard to occupants. We known that the primary danger in the event of a fire is not the fire itself but the smoke and gas produced. Therefore, it is vital that the materials and products that are installed contribute as little smoke and gas as possible when burnt. LSZH cable can be employed in the following situations:

Confined spaces with large amounts of cables in close proximity to humans or sensitive electronic equipment, such as submarines and ships.
Mass transit, central office facilities and telecommunication applications.

UTP vs STP Cables for 10GBASE-T Network

The growing use of virtualization in data centers has addressed the need for 10G Ethernet as a way to reduce the complexities when using the existing 1G Ethernet infrastructures. Moving to 10G Ethernet has a number of choice from 10GbE interfaces including CX4, 10G SFP+, SFP+ direct attach copper (10G SFP+ Cu) and 10GBASE-T. However, 10GBASE-T is perceived as a more cost-effective solution for broad deployments, which provides 10 Gbit/s connections over unshielded or shielded twisted pair cables over distances up to 100 meters (330 ft).

Recent market research shows an increased demand in Internet traffic. New applications coupled with the growth of Internet users are driving the need for increased bandwidth. 10 Gb/s Ethernet over structured copper cabling systems can address this demand. The existing structured cabling systems allow to use old equipment and add the latest communication technologies, which help to scale the networks to 10 Gigabit speeds and leverage the investment in installed copper cabling infrastructure. For 10GBASE-T data transmission, both shielded twisted pair (STP) and unshielded twisted pair (UTP) copper cabling systems are applicable. The primary focus of this paper will include the guidance to choose UTP vs STP twisted pair cables for 10GBASE-T network.

10GBASE-T Overview

Copper cabling remains the medium of choice of network managers for horizontal cabling. Due to the continued predominance of copper cabling, the IEEE P802.3an-2006 standard defined a specification for running 10 Gigabit Ethernet over twisted-pair copper, which is designated as 10GBASE-T. The strength of 10GBASE-T comes from its underlying technology, allowing it to dramatically expand the applications for high speed Ethernet.

10GBASE-T Technology

10GBASE-T is the fourth generation of IEEE standardized BASE-T technologies which all use twisted pair cabling to provide 10Mbps, 100Mbps, 1Gbps and 10Gbps data transmission. It is backward-compatible with prior generations. Because BASE-T devices have used an auto-negotiation protocol defined by IEEE to determine the capabilities supported by the other end of the link, this backward-compatibility means that upgrades could be performed one end at a time, allowing quick and easy incremental improvement of network speed without changing the wiring or upgrades of equipment.

10GBASE-T Applications

One of the first applications for 10GBASE-T is to serve as an uplink technology offering high-bandwidth connectivity, from the access or distribution layer to the next point of aggregation. 10GBASE-T promises to be a very successful high-speed networking solution for horizontal copper applications and high-performance networking in the following areas:

HPC (high performance computing ) data centers both in new and existing installationsEnterprise server farms/data centers also with both new and legacy mediaLocal uplinks, aggregation links and inter-switch linksOther applications that can use in-building structured cabling with both new and legacy media

What Is Twisted Pair Cable?

A twisted pair consists of a pair of insulated wires twisted together. It is a patch cable type used in telecommunication for very long time. Cable twisting helps to reduce noise pickup from outside sources and crosstalk on multi-pair cables.Twisted pair cable is good for transferring balanced differential signals, which can date back to the early days of telegraph and radio. Twisted pair cabling is often used in data networks for short and medium length connections because of its relatively lower costs compared to optical fiber and coaxial cable. The two types of twisted pairs are unshielded twisted pair (UTP) and shielded twisted pair (STP).

Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP)

The most commonly used form of twisted pair is unshielded twisted pair (UTP). It consists of color-coded copper wires, but does not include any foil or braiding as insulator to protect against interference. The quality of UTP may vary from telephone-grade wire to extremely high-speed cable. The cable has four pairs of wires inside the jacket. Each pair is twisted with a different number of twists per inch to help eliminate interference from adjacent pairs and other electrical devices. The following figure shows the different categories of UTP cables.

twisted pair type

The ANSI/TIA-568-C.2 standard states that category cable must be smaller than 0.354 inches in outside diameter, regardless of whether the cable is shielded or unshielded. Because of the use of space and fillers as a barrier against alien crosstalk, UTP cables tend to be larger in diameter than shielded cables. Actually, many UTP patch cable designs fall close to the permitted maximum diameter. Larger conduit and hanging devices must be used to support UTP cables due to their larger outside diameters. This can add cost to a project as well as necessitate more pathway space for the cables. With an established cable design, the UTP cables are simple to terminate since they do not possess shields and the prerequisite drain wire. This translates to quicker termination times and thus reduced cost. UTP cable and unshielded connective hardware (jacks and patch panels) also tend to cost less than their shielded counterparts.

Shielded Twisted Pair (STP)

Shielded twisted pair (STP) is similar to unshielded twisted pair (UTP). However, it contains an extra foil wrapping or copper braid jacket to help shield the cable signals from interference. The additional covering in STP cable stops electromagnetic interference from leaking out of or into the cable. Compared to UTP, STP cables are costlier. But STP has the advantage of being capable of supporting higher transmission rates across longer distances. STP cables are often used in Ethernet networks, particularly fast-data-rate Ethernet.

The other usual STP cables, often called foil twisted-pair cables or screened twisted-pair cables, make use of just a thinner outer foil shield. These cables are thin and more affordable versus the braided STP cable; but they are very difficult to install. Except in cases where the maximum pulling tension and minimum bend radius are strictly observed, these thinner cables may be torn during the installation process. STP cable is used to eliminate inductive and capacitive coupling. Twisting cancels out inductive coupling, while the shield eliminates capacitive coupling. Most applications for this cable are between equipment, racks and buildings. Shielding adds some attenuation to the cable (compared to unshielded), but usually not because in the case of balanced transmission, the complementing signals will effectively cancel out any shield currents, so shield current losses are negligible.

Guidance to Choose Between UTP vs STP Cables for 10GBASE-T Network

For 10GBASE-T data transmission with distance up to 100 meters, both STP and UTP copper cabling systems are applicable as it defines in IEEE 802.3an-2006 standard. From what we have discussed above, both STP and UTP have their advantages and disadvantages. So which one will you choose for achieving the best performance of your 10GBASE-T network? The following will talk about their performances of UTP vs STP in 10GBASE-T network from the sides of alien crosstalk, termination & installation and costs.

Alien Crosstalk

In 10GBASE-T applications, it’s alien crosstalk (the noise source) most limits the data transmission performance over copper cable. Because the 10GBASE-T transceiver can’t detect and compensate for noise from adjacent channels. That must be suppressed within the cabling system to ensure reliable data transmission. This noise is measured as power sum alien near-end crosstalk (PSANEXT) and as power sum alien attenuation to crosstalk ratio at the far-end (PSAACRF). Crosstalk should be measured in a 6-around-1 (namely six cables tightly bundled around a center cable) cabling configuration considering the worst-case effect.

In IEEE 802.3an-2006 standard, Cat6a UTP, Cat6 STP cable, and UTP Cat6 cabling are talked about to support 10GBASE cabling system. For example, Cat6a UTP cabling, to reduce alien crosstalk, manufactures think about increasing separation between cables and tighter twisted rates or crosstalk suppression within the printed circuit boards as to the connectors. These methods comply with TIA/EIA (Telecommunication Industry Association) standard PSANEXT and PSAACRF specifications for reaching 100m distance. Without these improvements, category 6 UTP system can’t meet the alien crosstalk limits required for 100 meters of 10GBASE-T transmission. For properly installed and bonded STP cabling, foil screens within the cable prevent signals from coupling. Thus, it reduces alien crosstalk below required performance levels. STP cabling system can provide superior alien crosstalk performance.


STP cable includes a shield around each individual pair. Another screened STP cable includes an overall shield or braid , around all pairs with an additional foil around each individual shield. The cable design is able to deliver excellent alien near-end crosstalk performance as there is no crosstalk between pairs since the pairs are individually shielded. But at the same time, STP cable is not easy for termination, resulting in more difficult cable management. Because the foil and drain wire in an STP cable must be pulled back and twisted around the cable end prior to termination. And the unused foils should be trimmed. But for UTP cable, it’s designed as unshielded. So the termination takes longer for STP cabling than UTP.

Bonding and Grounding

Proper structured grounding processes is useful for protecting personnel and expensive equipment. In data centers, most 10GBASE-T compliant copper cabling is installed. So integrity of the bonding and grounding system must be sound to realize the full performance of the system.

The UTP cabling connectivity doesn’t need complete system bonding. But you should consider the integrity of the grounding of the patch panels and racks to the common grounding point to protect the infrastructure. While for STP cabling system, bonding cable to the connectivity components is required to ensure proper performance. For 10GBASE-T data transmission, you should be careful with the implementation of the power and grounding system that the copper data cable system resides in. If the power or cabling system is not properly designed and/or installed, data rate errors are likely to happen. As 10GBASE-T applications are very sensitive to noise, potential differences in electrical grounds can cause bad influence on 10 GbE data transmission. If there are data rate errors within an STP cabling data network, you should better check the bonding and grounding as well as the overall design of the power and ground system.


The overall cost of STP cabling system is higher than UTP cabling system. On one hand, STP cable has shielding material. This cable designs raise the cost of STP cable. On the other hand, during installation, an STP solution will take longer to terminate jack modules and properly bond the structured cabling system as the shielding makes this cable heavier and more difficult to bend or manipulate. That will add a little more to the installation cost.

The Future of 10GBASE-T

10GBASE-T can dramatically expand the opportunity for 10G Ethernet networking by supporting simpler, cheaper, twisted-pair copper cabling. Broad deployment on 10GBASE-T will simplify data center infrastructure, making it easier to manage servers connectivity and deliver the needed bandwidth. In the near future, 10GBASE-T will eventually become the predominate media choice.

Ref: https://www.fs.com/utp-or-stp-cables-for-10gbase-t-network-aid-580.html